<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Do It Yourself NAS &#187; QNAP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.diynas.com/category/prebuilt-nas/qnap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.diynas.com</link>
	<description>build your own network attached storage device</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 22:40:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>QNAP TS-659 Pro II Review</title>
		<link>http://www.diynas.com/2011/09/19/qnap-ts-659-pro-ii-review/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=qnap-ts-659-pro-ii-review</link>
		<comments>http://www.diynas.com/2011/09/19/qnap-ts-659-pro-ii-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 16:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iSCSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QNAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samba]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diynas.com/?p=133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have been playing around with the QNAP TS-659 Pro II unit over the last month or so. Based on the Intel Atom D525 platform, it has 6 bays and dual GbE ports, making it a candidate for the high end SMB market. via AnandTech]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>We have been playing around with the QNAP TS-659 Pro II unit over the last month or so. Based on the Intel Atom D525 platform, it has 6 bays and dual GbE ports, making it a candidate for the high end SMB market.</p></blockquote>
<p>via <a href="http://www.anandtech.com/show/4834/qnap-ts659-pro-ii-review">AnandTech</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.diynas.com/2011/09/19/qnap-ts-659-pro-ii-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>QNAP TS-210 Turbo NAS Review</title>
		<link>http://www.diynas.com/2010/11/29/qnap-ts-210-turbo-nas-review/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=qnap-ts-210-turbo-nas-review</link>
		<comments>http://www.diynas.com/2010/11/29/qnap-ts-210-turbo-nas-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 06:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[QNAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diynas.com/?p=110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This particular NAS box also makes a big song and dance about iSCSI. This allows you to allocate portions of an existing volume as targets. In the speed stakes, the TS-210 lagged behind the more expensive TS-219P and both Synology NAS boxes in all the tests. However, it was still streets ahead of most of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>This particular NAS box also makes a big song and dance about iSCSI. This allows you to allocate portions of an existing volume as targets. In the speed stakes, the TS-210 lagged behind the more expensive TS-219P and both Synology NAS boxes in all the tests. However, it was still streets ahead of most of the other NAS boxes we&#8217;ve tested. For example, it averaged 35.4MB/sec in the large file-reading test. The TS-210 is an excellent example of how easy a NAS box should be to configure and use. It’s only let down by its unexceptional transfer rate.</p></blockquote>
<p>via<a href="http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/networking/2010/11/29/qnap-ts-210-turbo-nas/1?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+bit-tech%2Farticles+%28bit-tech.net+Article+Feed%29"> bit-tech.net</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.diynas.com/2010/11/29/qnap-ts-210-turbo-nas-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>QNAP TS-219P Turbo NAS Review</title>
		<link>http://www.diynas.com/2009/12/15/qnap-ts-219p-turbo-nas-review/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=qnap-ts-219p-turbo-nas-review</link>
		<comments>http://www.diynas.com/2009/12/15/qnap-ts-219p-turbo-nas-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 03:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[QNAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diynas.com/?p=68</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[X-bit labs reviews the QNAP TS-219P Turbo NAS.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>X-bit labs reviews the <a href="http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/networking/display/qnap-ts219p.html">QNAP TS-219P Turbo NAS</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.diynas.com/2009/12/15/qnap-ts-219p-turbo-nas-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SMB NAS Roundup</title>
		<link>http://www.diynas.com/2007/02/03/smb-nas-roundup/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=smb-nas-roundup</link>
		<comments>http://www.diynas.com/2007/02/03/smb-nas-roundup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 02:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Buffalo Terastation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comparisons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hammer Z-Box]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LaCie Ethernet Disk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netgear ReadyNAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QNAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thecus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diynas.com/2007/02/03/smb-nas-roundup/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AnandTech has one of the best comparisons of NAS devices on the internet.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AnandTech has one of the <a href="http://www.anandtech.com/IT/showdoc.aspx?i=2881">best comparisons of NAS devices on the internet</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.diynas.com/2007/02/03/smb-nas-roundup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

