<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Do It Yourself NAS &#187; Benchmarks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.diynas.com/category/category/benchmarks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.diynas.com</link>
	<description>build your own network attached storage device</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 20:49:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>LSI MegaRAID SATA and SAS 9260-8i RAID Card Review &#8211; RAID Cards and You &#8211; Legit Reviews</title>
		<link>http://www.diynas.com/2010/01/20/lsi-megaraid-sata-and-sas-9260-8i-raid-card-review-raid-cards-and-you-legit-reviews/</link>
		<comments>http://www.diynas.com/2010/01/20/lsi-megaraid-sata-and-sas-9260-8i-raid-card-review-raid-cards-and-you-legit-reviews/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 05:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAID Cards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diynas.com/?p=70</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Legit Reviews takes a 6Gbps SATA/SAS LSI RAID card for and spin and ends up with a lot of performance graphs. Today I have LSI&#8217;s latest RAID card, the MegaRAID 9260-8i SAS 6Gbps controller. Featuring a compact PowerPC RAID-on-Chip controller, 512mb of DDR2 cache, a PCIe 2.0 x8 slot, and SAS/SATA 6Gbps connectivity, the 9260-8i [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.legitreviews.com/article/1178/1/">Legit Reviews</a> takes a 6Gbps SATA/SAS LSI RAID card for and spin and ends up with a lot of performance graphs.</p>
<blockquote><p>Today I have LSI&#8217;s latest RAID card, the MegaRAID 9260-8i SAS 6Gbps controller. Featuring a compact PowerPC RAID-on-Chip controller, 512mb of DDR2 cache, a PCIe 2.0 x8 slot, and SAS/SATA 6Gbps connectivity, the 9260-8i is one well equipped RAID card. Marketing documentation boasts of maximum 2875MB/s reads and 1850MB/s writes through the 800MHz PowerPC LSISAS2108 ROC, well over three times the throughput limits of the ICH10R controller built into Intel&#8217;s desktop platforms.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.diynas.com/2010/01/20/lsi-megaraid-sata-and-sas-9260-8i-raid-card-review-raid-cards-and-you-legit-reviews/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A quick first look at USB 3.0 performance</title>
		<link>http://www.diynas.com/2009/12/07/a-quick-first-look-at-usb-3-0-performance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.diynas.com/2009/12/07/a-quick-first-look-at-usb-3-0-performance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 16:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USB]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diynas.com/?p=65</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Tech Report has benchmarks of the new USB 3.0 standard. They&#8217;re compared against USB 2.0 and eSATA.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Tech Report has <a href="http://techreport.com/articles.x/18077">benchmarks of the new USB 3.0 standard</a>. They&#8217;re compared against USB 2.0 and eSATA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.diynas.com/2009/12/07/a-quick-first-look-at-usb-3-0-performance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Drobo Performance Stats</title>
		<link>http://www.diynas.com/2009/12/06/drobo-performance-stats/</link>
		<comments>http://www.diynas.com/2009/12/06/drobo-performance-stats/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 03:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drobo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diynas.com/?p=63</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[StorageNerve has benchmarks for the 4-slot Drobo connected using USB 2.0 and Firewire 800.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>StorageNerve has <a href="http://storagenerve.com/2009/12/01/drobo-performance-stats/">benchmarks for the 4-slot Drobo</a> connected using USB 2.0 and Firewire 800.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.diynas.com/2009/12/06/drobo-performance-stats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comprehensive RAID Performance Report</title>
		<link>http://www.diynas.com/2007/05/10/comprehensive-raid-performance-report/</link>
		<comments>http://www.diynas.com/2007/05/10/comprehensive-raid-performance-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 21:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAID Cards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diynas.com/2007/05/10/comprehensive-raid-performance-report/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[George Ou over at ZDNet has RAID benchmarks for various flavors of RAID, based mainly around the RAID10 and the Intel ICH8R RAID controller.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Ou over at ZDNet has <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/?p=484&amp;page=1">RAID benchmarks</a> for various flavors of RAID, based mainly around the RAID10 and the Intel ICH8R RAID controller.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.diynas.com/2007/05/10/comprehensive-raid-performance-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prebuilt NAS Benchmarks</title>
		<link>http://www.diynas.com/2007/03/22/prebuilt-nas-benchmarks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.diynas.com/2007/03/22/prebuilt-nas-benchmarks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 05:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benchmarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diynas.com/2007/03/22/prebuilt-nas-benchmarks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SmallNetBuilder has a list of NAS devices benchmarked by different criteria. A homebuilt Ubuntu NAS device make an appearance in several benchmarks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SmallNetBuilder has a <a href="http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/component/option,com_nas/Itemid,190">list of NAS devices benchmarked</a> by different criteria. A homebuilt Ubuntu NAS device make an appearance in several benchmarks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.diynas.com/2007/03/22/prebuilt-nas-benchmarks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Battle for 160GB: Hard Disk Drive Roundup Part I</title>
		<link>http://www.diynas.com/2007/03/17/battle-for-160gb-hard-disk-drive-roundup-part-i/</link>
		<comments>http://www.diynas.com/2007/03/17/battle-for-160gb-hard-disk-drive-roundup-part-i/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 01:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hard Drives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diynas.com/2007/03/17/battle-for-160gb-hard-disk-drive-roundup-part-i/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[X-bit labs benchmarks eleven 160 GB hard drives.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>X-bit labs benchmarks <a href="http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/storage/display/160gb-roundup.html">eleven 160 GB hard drives</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.diynas.com/2007/03/17/battle-for-160gb-hard-disk-drive-roundup-part-i/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NAS too slow? Try DAS</title>
		<link>http://www.diynas.com/2007/03/16/nas-too-slow-try-das/</link>
		<comments>http://www.diynas.com/2007/03/16/nas-too-slow-try-das/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chassis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diynas.com/2007/03/16/nas-too-slow-try-das/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SmallNetBuilder takes a look at the Norco DS-500, a five drive eSATA attached drive enclosure.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SmallNetBuilder takes a look at the <a href="http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=29889&amp;Itemid=79">Norco DS-500</a>, a five drive eSATA attached drive enclosure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.diynas.com/2007/03/16/nas-too-slow-try-das/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cheap RAID Ravages WD Raptor</title>
		<link>http://www.diynas.com/2007/03/12/cheap-raid-ravages-wd-raptor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.diynas.com/2007/03/12/cheap-raid-ravages-wd-raptor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 22:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hard Drives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diynas.com/2007/03/12/cheap-raid-ravages-wd-raptor/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tom&#8217;s Hardware benchmarks a couple of 7200 drives in RAID 0 and compares them against the 10,000 RPM Western Digital Raptor. For fun they put the Raptor in a RAID 0 array too.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom&#8217;s Hardware <a href="http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/03/12/cheap_raid_ravages_wd_raptor/index.html">benchmarks a couple of 7200 drives in RAID 0</a> and compares them against the 10,000 RPM Western Digital Raptor. For fun they put the Raptor in a RAID 0 array too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.diynas.com/2007/03/12/cheap-raid-ravages-wd-raptor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Understanding Hard Drive Performance</title>
		<link>http://www.diynas.com/2007/03/09/understanding-hard-drive-performance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.diynas.com/2007/03/09/understanding-hard-drive-performance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 17:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hard Drives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diynas.com/2007/03/09/understanding-hard-drive-performance/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tom&#8217;s Hardware takes a look at hard drive performance, focusing mainly on 7200 RPM drives. This article will give you an overview of all parameters that are relevant to hard drive performance. These are the drive form factor, platter diameter and platter count, recording technology and data density, rotation speed and access time, interface and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom&#8217;s Hardware takes <a href="http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/03/05/understanding-hard-drive-performance/index.html">a look at hard drive performance</a>, focusing mainly on 7200 RPM drives.</p>
<blockquote><p> This article will give you an overview of all parameters that are relevant to hard drive performance. These are the drive form factor, platter diameter and platter count, recording technology and data density, rotation speed and access time, interface and buffer memory.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.diynas.com/2007/03/09/understanding-hard-drive-performance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>400GB Hard Disk Drives in RAID 0, RAID 5 and RAID 10 Arrays: Performance Analysis</title>
		<link>http://www.diynas.com/2007/02/24/400gb-hard-disk-drives-in-raid-0-raid-5-and-raid-10-arrays-performance-analysis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.diynas.com/2007/02/24/400gb-hard-disk-drives-in-raid-0-raid-5-and-raid-10-arrays-performance-analysis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 23:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Areca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hard Drives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAID Cards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diynas.com/2007/02/24/400gb-hard-disk-drives-in-raid-0-raid-5-and-raid-10-arrays-performance-analysis/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[X-bit labs benchmarks several different models of 400 GB SATA drives in four drive raid arrays. Tests are done using an Areca ARC1220 RAID controller, probably on Windows.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>X-bit labs <a href="http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/storage/display/400gb-raid0510.html">benchmarks</a> several different models of 400 GB SATA drives in four drive raid arrays. Tests are done using an Areca ARC1220 RAID controller, probably on Windows.<a href="http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/storage/display/400gb-raid0510.html"> </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.diynas.com/2007/02/24/400gb-hard-disk-drives-in-raid-0-raid-5-and-raid-10-arrays-performance-analysis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
